Wednesday, October 4, 2017

Bill Would Exclude Business Loans to Vets from MBL Cap

Legislation (H.R. 3866) was introduced on September 28 to amend the Federal Credit Union Act by excluding extensions of credit made to veterans from the definition of a member business loan.

This bill would exclude these loans from the aggregate member business loan cap of 12.25 percent of assets.

The legislation was introduced by Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX) and cosponsored by Rep. Paul Cook (R-CA).

However, this bill represents a fundamental departure from other extensions of credit that are excluded from the definition of a member business loan (MBL).

The extensions of credit that are currently excluded from the definition of a MBL pose minimal risk to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, as these loans are fully secured by shares or 1-to-4 primary residence, are fully insured or guaranteed by a governmental agency, or are less than or equal to $50,000.

Read the bill.

2 comments:

  1. This would be a material exception.

    Many if not most of the nation's largest credit unions are military based and have also added the public communities adjacent their bases via community charters. They already have the scale and the reach to do business banking in volume with both vets and non-vets. This change would allow a much greater volume of risk to a system that has no risk-based capital requirement for individual credit unions.

    Instead, all cus of all sizes must share the risks of all others through their mandatory deposits to their federal deposit insurance fund. The NCUA is presently increasing this fund's deposit requirement for all credit unions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's many, it's not most.
      That said, you're right and NCUA is increasing to 2% as they will not stop at 1:39.
      They're just not being transparent about it, nor are nafcu and CUNA. We are planning on 2% and assessments to get there and for taxis.

      Delete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.