Friday, October 20, 2017

A Social Network as a Common Bond

National Credit Union Administration McWatters stated that Congress should allow credit unions to serve communities that exist only online.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, McWatters stated that "[c]hances are [such a change] would be very broad ... I am trying to parallel reality today as opposed to what it was a generation—or two or three or four generations—ago.”

The American Bankers Association spokesperson commented that the proposal to open credit union membership further was laughable.

In the interview, McWatters also defended the agency's decision to close the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund and merge its remnants with the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund and to raise the Normal Operating Level for the insurance fund to 1.39 percent.

McWatters further stated that he plans to revisit the risk-based capital requirements for credit unions adopted by his predecessor, as he does not believe the rule hews close enough to the Federal Credit Union Act.

Read the story (subscription required).

1 comment:

  1. McW should consider that beyond the original idea of common bond, not only has the the world changed but the people have too.
    There are no common bonds, it’s one common bond, America.
    He’s right that congress should revisit the FCU Act.
    And then close it, collapse it and recognize the reality that Americans don’t shop for financial solutions bonded together but sexual preference, employer, village, ethnicity, whatever.
    We’re Americans.
    The only common bond of CUs is to preserve the federal tax exemption.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.