Tuesday, October 10, 2017

180 CUs Borrowed from Fed's Discount Window in Q3 2015

During the third quarter of 2015, 180 credit unions borrowed from the Federal Reserve's Discount Window.

In comparison, 166 credit unions borrowed from the Federal Reserve's Discount Window during the second quarter of 2015.

Credit unions borrowed 270 times from the Federal Reserve's Discount Window during the third quarter of 2015.

The aggregate amount borrowed from the Federal Reserve was approximately $505.7 million.

The average amount borrowed was just shy of $1.9 million. The median amount borrowed was $75,000.

There were 45 Discount Window loans of $1 million or more during the quarter.

Visions Federal Credit Union (Endicott, NY) borrowed the single largest amount at $65 million on August 19. The credit union borrowed a total of $210 million from the Federal Reserve during the quarter.

Several credit unions actively borrowed from the Discount Window during the third quarter. Aurora Credit Union (Milwaukee, WI) borrowed from the Federal Reserve 14 times during the quarter. Both Vermont State Employees Credit Union (Montpelier, VT) and Services Center FCU (Yankton, SD) visited the Discount Window 13 times. Glendale FCU (Glendale, CA) borrowed from the Federal Reserve 12 times.

All credit unions, except for four, borrowed under the Federal Reserve's primary credit program, which is reserved for only well run credit unions. Three credit union borrowed from the seasonal credit program, while two credit unions borrowed from the secondary credit program.

The Federal Reserve is required by law to disclose with a two year delay information on borrowings from the Discount Window.
Posted by at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.