Monday, February 17, 2020

NCUA's Harper: NCUA's Consumer Compliance Oversight Lacks Robustness

In an opinion piece appearing in CU Today, National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board Member Todd Harper wrote that customers of a bank acquired by a credit union will not have the same level of consumer financial protection oversight in their new credit union.

He pointed out in the column that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) has a more robust consumer compliance program than NCUA.

He noted that FDIC regularly conducts dedicated consumer compliance reviews that are separate and apart from safety and soundness exams, while NCUA with the exception of fair lending exams combines consumer compliance exams as part of the agency's safety and soundness exams performed NCUA's regional offices.

The agency has only budgeted for 30 fair lending examines in 2020. Also, the consumer compliance exams conducted by NCUA's regional offices will only cover some of the many consumer financial protection laws on the books.

He further stated that the agency has only 15 or so regional examiners, who are consumer compliance subject matter experts. In comparison, the FDIC has hundreds of examiners committed to performing these exams.

Despite his reservations about the agency's consumer compliance oversight gap, he still supports the agency's proposed rule on combination transactions.

Read the opinion piece.

1 comment:

  1. There is no NCUA requirement for a compliance officer to be appointed by a credit union for general compliance responsibilities at any asset level. Similarly, there is no requirement for separation of internal audit and compliance responsibilities at credit unions regardless of asset size. That becomes a problem when "NCUA does not require" is the decision maker as to creating/funding such aspects of the credit union.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.