Sunday, April 1, 2018

Credit Union Sues San Francisco over Taxi Medallion Loans

San Francisco Federal Credit Union is suing the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) seeking damages from defaulted taxi medallion loans.

The complaint states that the credit union partnered with SFMTA to finance taxi medallion loans. The credit union underwrote and financed over 700 medallions worth more than $125 million in taxi medallion loans.

The lawsuit alleges that the city did not enforce its own transportation code when it failed to crack down on ride sharing companies. As a result, the taxi medallion market has collapsed with no medallion sales in two years.

The credit union claims numerous borrowers have defaulted on their medallion loans with at least 99 medallion loans in foreclosure. The credit union further states that it has suffered million of dollars of losses.

The credit union stated that it "has charged off or increased reserves for loan losses associated with its taxi medallion portfolio by more than $10,000,000."

The lawsuit includes claims of breach of contract, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, violation of the SFMTA's fiduciary duty toward the credit union and negligent misrepresentation of the city's approach to the medallion market.

The credit union is seeking damages of $28 million, attorney fees, and an order requiring SFMTA to repurchase Transferable Medallions from the credit union.

The lawsuit was filed in Superior Court of San Francisco on March 27.

Click here to search for the case and select the case query function.


No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.