Monday, April 30, 2018

Coalition Urges Senate Finance Committee to Examine Tax Exempt Status of Large CUs

The National Taxpayers Union along with other conservative public policy groups on April 24 wrote the Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R - UT) and the committee urging them to examine the tax exemption of large credit unions to ensure that these credit unions are adhering to the original intent of the statute.

The group expressed concerns that some of these large credit unions have strayed from their intended purpose.

The letter noted that many credit unions remain focused on their core mission, but some large credit unions operate like banks instead of credit unions.

The group wrote: "A tax exemption gives these select few credit unions a distinct edge over taxpaying banks and creates an uneven playing field, particularly over smaller community banks, which compete for similar customers."

The organizations stated that as credit unions evolve Congress should regularly review the governing tax and regulatory provisions to ensure that the tax exemption "is aligned with the intent of Congress and the interest of sound economic principles."

Read the letter.








3 comments:

  1. They’re correct.
    The large credit unions are banks that don’t pay taxes.
    Been that way for years.
    But congress is corrupted.
    Hatch would rather have the IRS “look” at credit unions and see what the CEOs are paid.
    That insures more years of banks and credit unions giving bribe money to icba, CUNA, ncafcu, aba who then grease politicians.
    The lobbyists and politicians win, banks and credit unions lose. Lose money, lose regulatory relief. And while politicians allow FINTECH into consumer lending with no regulations.
    banks and credit unions should quit wasting money on lobbyists.
    And big CUs should be taxed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Strayed from the mission."

    Accept deposits. Make loans. Give member-owners access to their funds in today's marketplace. I don't see where that has changed. CUs have been making business loans since Day 1. Our economy and legal environments have developed since WWII making CUs adjust to the changing Business ownership models and funding demands.

    I am sorry but the one branch credit union no longer exists as does the one branch (and one state) bank. CUs have had checking accounts for 40 years (live with it)!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All good and true, but should pay taxes.
      No one is saying don’t accept deposits or make loans.
      What we are saying is you’re a bank that doesn’t pay taxes. Those over $500M or $1B should be taxed.
      Modest means?
      Bull sh—.
      Banks provide more loans to modest means than credit unions do.

      Delete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.