Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Washington Updates

House passed a bill backed by bank and credit union trade groups and a bipartisan group of House members called on the Office of Financial Research (OFR) study the potential impact of the current expected credit loss (CECL) accounting model.

The House on October 22 voted 249-173 to pass the Corporate Transparency Act (H.R. 2513). The bill is supported by both bank and credit union trade groups. The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), would direct the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network to create a national database that banks could use to verify a business’s beneficial ownership information. The bill was amended before passage to include legislation championed by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) that would modernize the existing anti-money laundering/Bank Secrecy Act framework by, among other things, enhancing bank-law enforcement communications.

Also, a bipartisan group of 28 House members last week called on the Financial Stability Oversight Council to require that the OFR study potential financial stability effects of the CECL model for loan loss accounting, which goes into effect for large reporting companies in January. ‌

Specifically, the lawmakers called on OFR to study CECL’s procyclical characteristics and their effects on access to credit and market volatility; the effects of CECL on the solvency and leverage of financial institutions; and the effects of procyclicality on institutions complying with CECL, including contagion risk during times of economic stress. Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.