Thursday, February 21, 2019

Interdependency Risk and An Emergency Merger

The current narrative from the credit union industry is that the emergency merger of Progressive Credit Union (New York, NY) into Pentagon Federal Credit Union (McLean, VA) saved the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) from the loss that would have arisen from the failure of Progressive.

However, an untold story is about the interdependency risk associated with credit unions trying to prop up Progressive CU.

As I previously pointed out, Progressive Credit Union received an exemption from the nonmember deposit cap in 2015.

A document From the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) noted that Progressive CU in recent years primarily funded itself through nonmember deposits, which were all from credit unions.

As of December 2018, the number of nonmember accounts at Progressive were 246. These dollar value of these nonmember deposits were slightly more than $76.8 million. Nonmember deposits comprised almost 32 percent of total deposits and shares at Progressive.

In addition, Progressive CU had $52 million in uninsured shares and deposits, of which $36.25 million were nonmember deposits.

Under the scenario where Progressive CU was liquidated in an insured depositor payoff, these uninsured deposits would absorb losses before the NCUSIF.

It is possible that some credit unions that funded Progressive CU could have become impaired. But only NCUA would know if this is the case.

This emergency merger seems to have more to do with keeping losses at Progressive from cascading to other credit unions.

The NCUA needs to seriously examine this issue of interdependency risk within the credit union industry.









2 comments:

  1. So what? I don't have a problem with this. As long as PenFed pays off those CDs at maturity, who cares? I don't think the problem is as widespread as Dr. Leggett infers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. penfed isn't the problem here.
    its ncua.
    they put the system at risk by allowing the taxi cus to put 70% of assets in taxi loans and then let them accept non member deposits and deposits from cus.
    penfed SAVED ncua.
    here is another question...why is ncua letting credit unions issue capital to EACH OTHER?
    That's not secondary capital that's enhanced interdependence risk.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.