Tuesday, December 26, 2017

Fox Guarding the Hen House?

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that a bipartisan bill (S. 2155) would force the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to hold open hearings on the agency's budget.

Currently, the NCUA Board holds voluntary public meetings on its budget.

However, the bill introduced by Sen. Heller (R - NV) would formalize this process.

The bill passed the Senate Banking Committee on December 5 and awaits action by the full Senate.

If the bill becomes law, the NCUA will be the only financial regulator required to hold a public hearing where the industry could weigh-in on spending decisions by the agency.

But former NCUA Chairman Debbie Matz warned that the bill would represent "an attack on the core of independent oversight."

Read the Wall Street Journal story (subscription required).

3 comments:

  1. NCUA needs to be held accountable by Congress.

    ReplyDelete
  2. All in, the only influence credit unions can have on NCUA budgeting is to whine.
    Treasury and congress should be all over NCUA. Just look at the corporate credit unions debacle and taxi loans.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It has been said before the NCUA is a "rogue" agency. Accountable to no one. Responsible to no one. Look at the billion$ in corporate credit union losses. Look at the billion$ in taxi loan losses. See a trend? And what do they do with these pseudo-NCUA examiners? Promote them to a higher pay grade. It is a lawless agency. Matz is now a sitting bought and paid for Bank director.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.