Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Significantly Undercapitalized Altier CU Affected by Bad Taxi Medallion Participation Loans

Altier Credit Union (Tempe, AZ) reported a deterioration in its financial performance, as taxi medallion participation loans weighed on its operation.

This credit union was brought to my attention by a reader.

In a 2012 comment letter to the National Credit Union Administration, Altier commented that its portfolio was "comprised of indirect lending, taxi medallions and manufactured housing." (Read the comment letter).

The $193 million credit union reported a year-to-date loss of $9.2 million, as the credit union recorded a provision for loan and lease losses during the first 3 quarters of 2017 of $9.1 million.

As a result of the loss, the credit union's net worth fell from $13.7 million at the end of 2016 to less than $4.5 million as of September 2017. The credit union's net worth ratio declined from 7.23 percent to 2.31 percent over the same time period. The credit union was significantly undercapitalized at the end of the third quarter.

The credit union is reporting almost $13 million in commercial loans, presumably taxi medallion participation loans. The credit union had $16.1 million in outstanding participation loans.

As of September 2017, $3.8 million in loans were 60 days or more past due, of which $3.3 million were participation loans. While the overall delinquency rate at Altier Credit Union was 2.68 percent, the delinquency rate on participation loans was 20.61 percent and the delinquency rate on commercial loans was 25.45 percent.

In addition, the credit union charged off $1.15 million in commercial loans through the first 3 quarters of 2017.

Furthermore, troubled debt restructured commercial loans not secured by real estate were approximately $7.4 million as of September 2017.

The increase in provision for loan and lease losses caused the credit union's allowance for loan and lease losses account to increase from almost $2 million at the end of 2016 to $9.8 million. The credit union's coverage ratio (allowance for loan and lease losses divided by delinquent loans) was 254.23 percent as of September 2017.

2 comments:

  1. Altier.
    Quorum.
    Melrose.
    Progressive.
    LOMTO.
    How many more?
    What’s the risk of assessments?
    McW, where’s that transparency you bragged about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like years of mismanagement. Who are the individuals that are or have been in charge and how are they being held accountable for this financial mess?

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.