Monday, September 25, 2017

CU Taxi Medallion Lender Likened to Last Decade's Predatory Subprime Lenders

The Philadelphia Inquirer is compares the collapsing of the Philadelphia taxi market to the mortgage meltdown last decade and has some harsh comments about Melrose Credit Union (Briarwood, NY).

The article states:
"[L]enders drew up medallion loans with huge balloon payments, made to people who couldn’t afford them but who never worried about paying them off when they came due in three years. Why? Because the taxi business was golden, generating ample revenue. Meanwhile, just as with real estate, the value of medallions kept rising.

Besides, there was always another chance to refinance.

Until, suddenly, there wasn’t."

This sounds so familiar to the the subprime mortgage crisis.

At their peak in October 2013, taxi medallion prices were $530,000. However, after Uber and Lyft entered the market, taxi medallion prices dropped precipitously and as of August 2017 were at $52,000.

According to the Inquirer story, Melrose financed medallion loans through a broker to borrowers with bad or no credit history and who neither understand or spoke English. A complaint against Melrose alleges that underwriting of taxi medallion loans was non-existent.

It is estimated that Melrose lent more than $120 million to Philadelphia medallion owners.

Because the financing of medallion loans were through thee year balloon loans, that meant every three years borrowers needed new loans to pay off those balloon loans. This also ensured new fee revenues for Melrose.

The article further notes that after Melrose was seized by the New York regulator, the credit union exacerbated the decline in medallion values as it stopped lending in the market.

Read the article.

2 comments:

  1. NCUA, asleep at the wheel.
    Meanwhile, they bother the hell out of Good credit unions for stupid stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is BUSINESS lending which is relatively new to credit unions. With NCUA conflicted as both Regulator and Insurer, credit unions can lose a lot more money to the businesses banks are limited by FDIC in lending to.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.