Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Seeking to Water Down Corporate CU Capital Rules

Credit Union Journal (subscription required) is reporting that the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) and some corporate credit union officials are trying to water down the corporate credit union capital rules that were finalized in 2010 following the corporate credit union debacle.

Specifically, they are objecting to the requirement from the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) that corporate credit unions when calculating their Tier 1 capital must deduct beginning on October 20, 2016 any amount of perpetual contributed capital (PCC) that causes PCC minus retained earnings, all divided by moving daily net average assets, to exceed two percent. After October 20, 2020, corporate credit unions must deduct any amount of PCC that causes PCC to exceed retained earnings, when calculating Tier 1 capital.

For example, CUNA wrote: "NCUA should eliminate the deduction of PCC from Tier 1 capital allowing PCC to be counted for all regulatory capital requirements as currently allowed by the corporate regulation until next year."

This means that a corporate credit union could fully meet its Tier 1 capital requirement through PCC.

However, this also makes the credit union system potentially less stable as the system becomes more interconnected.

As the corporate credit union meltdown illustrated, losses at corporate credit unions cascaded down to natural person credit unions, which caused natural person credit unions to write down equity investments in corporate credit unions.

NCUA argued in 2010 that without some minimum retained earnings requirement, corporate credit unions "would be a continued source of instability to the credit union system as a whole."

Maintaining the retained earnings requirement is good public policy. It would ensure that there is a sufficient loss absorbing buffer at corporate credit unions. This should improve the resiliency of the credit union system.

However, a better solution would be to require credit unions to deduct from their reserves some portion of any nonperpetual capital accounts at a corporate credit union and all perpetual contributed capital issued by a corporate credit union. But this would require congressional action.





2 comments:

  1. CUNA's former President & CEO was Bill Cheney. Cheney served as a director at both Corporate Credit Unions: WesCorp FCU and USCentral FCU Corporate Credit Union. Both went into conservatorship. Borth failed. Cheney moved on to serve as President and CEO at CUNA. Does it surprise anyone that CUNA is now doing the bidding for Cheney. Cheney is now the President & CEO at SchoolsFirst FCU.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.