Tuesday, July 8, 2014

No Corporate Separateness between CUs and Association

Eli Lilly FCU (Indianapolis, IN) and Inova FCU (Elkhart, IN) are using an association, Tru Direction, to evade field of membership limitations.

While Inova includes Tru Direction in its list of organizations that allow you to join the credit union, Eli Lilly FCU is blatantly advertising that this association can be used to qualify people for credit union membership, who otherwise are not able to join the credit union.

On Eli Lilly FCU's website, the credit union writes:

"If you are not affiliated with any of the above organizations, you can STILL become a member by joining Tru Direction, a non-profit association dedicated to financial literacy."

You can join Tru Direction by making a one-time payment of $5.

But there does not appear to be any corporate separateness between Tru Direction and these two credit unions.

The Board of Directors of Tru Direction is totally comprised of employees from the two credit unions.
  • Matt Snively, Board Chair, is a SVP, Wealth Mgmt & Strategic Projects at Eli Liily FCU;          
  • Vicki Spicher, Vice Chair, is VP of Operations at Inova FCU;
  • Lisa Markland, Treasurer, works in Human Resources at Eli Lilly FCU; and
  • Claire Kellems, Secretary, is an Executive Assistant at Inova FCU.
Googling the street address for Tru Direction indciates that the association is housed in the same building as an Eli Lilly FCU branch -- 225 South East Street. Indianapolis. In fact, the mailing address for Eli Lilly FCU is same as Tru Direction.

A further indication that there is a lack of corporate separateness between the credit unions and the association is that the only membership benefit listed on Tru Direction's website is being eligible to join any of our affiliate credit unions.

1 comment:

  1. As a CEO of a Credit Union I hate to admit it, but I totally agree. There are advantages to being a credit union and disadvantages. A limited FOM is one of the latter but it allows the advantages to continue.

    In fact, repealing the tax exemption and still having a limited FOM would put the credit unions at a distinct disadvantage.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.