Thursday, May 19, 2011

Problem Credit Unions: Numbers Up; Assets and Shares Down in April

NCUA reported that the number of problem credit unions increased by 8 in April to 374 credit unions – tying the second most during this current credit cycle. In October 2010, there were 378 problem credit unions. A problem credit union is defined as having a CAMEL code of 4 or 5.

Credit unions with less than $100 million in assets accounted for the increase in the number of problem credit unions.

However, assets and shares (deposits) in problem credit union fell in April. According to NCUA, assets and shares in problem credit unions fell by $400 million in April to $41.6 billion and $36.9 billion, respectively. NCUA reported that 4.87 percent of all insured shares and 4.55 percent of industry assets were in problem credit unions.



No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.