Wednesday, January 19, 2011

State Employees' CU Seeks to Set the Record Straight

Earlier this week, I did a post based on a column by Gretchen Morgensen of The New York Times. Jim Blaine, President of State Employees' Credit Union, wrote Ms. Morgensen seeking to set the record straight. Jim Blaine asked that I publish his letter. Below is his letter.

REF: Article: Arbitration, Litigation, Aggravation

Dear Ms. Morgenson:

Was, of course, surprised to find from your article that State Employees’ Credit Union was an abuser of widows and orphans! Certainly not how SECU is generally viewed, nor an impression supported by the facts in the case.

Believe your readers would like to know:

1) Ms. Cohen purchased the investment in question from XCU Capital brokerage in September 2005. Ms. Cohen has never had an account with SECU.

2) The XCU Capital brokerage investment representative on the transaction, Mr. James Trujillo, was working through USE Credit Union in San Diego, California.

3) In September 2007, XCU Capital was acquired by the brokerage firm LPL located in Boston, Massachusetts. Individual brokerage accounts were transferred from XCU Capital to LPL.

4) In January 2008, SECU acquired the corporate brokerage “shell” of XCU, after all accounts had been transferred, and our “due diligence” found no existing complaints/liabilities associated with XCU Capital.

5) The brokerage charter was moved to North Carolina and renamed SECU Brokerage Services in May 2008. Ms. Cohen does not have an account with SECU Brokerage.

6) Ms. Cohen’s complaint was filed in May 2009. (So much for our liability research!)

7) SECU, under California law, has been placed in the position to arbitrate/litigate this matter. A position which continues to amaze us! All parties currently characterize themselves as victims!

The merits of this case do need to be resolved, but hopefully you can understand our concern with the implications of your article. We would like to yell slander, libel, retraction, apology; but perhaps from the New York Times perspective, the word “treasonable” best applies. Treasonable? Yes, treasonable, since many of your critics say The Newspaper has lost its way, is past its prime, and the quality of journalism represented by your article certainly gives “aid and comfort” to your enemies!

Definitely not up to “the standard of the Times”, nor Pulitzer quality. You smeared us all.

Jim Blaine
President
State Employees' Credit Union

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.