Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Narrative Approach Cannot Be Used to Do End-Run Around Court Decision

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) stated that federal credit unions cannot use the newly approved narrative approach to regain broad field of memberships vacated by the March 2018 federal court decision.

NCUA acknowledged that a number of federal credit unions took advantage of the expanded rural district and combined statistical area (CSA) parameters permitted by the agency's 2016 amendment to its field of membership rule.

As a result of the court decision, those federal credit unions are no longer permitted to utilize those broad fields of membership.

During the June 21, 2018 open board meeting, Frank Kressman, NCUA Associate General Counsel, stated that it is not possible for federal credit unions to use the narrative approach to do an end-run around the court order.

Kressman said the following:
"No credit union can use the narrative approach to regain the expanded fields of membership they had or expanded rural districts or CSAs. The reason for that, is that the narrative approach only applies to well-defined local communities that are based on commonality of interest and interaction among the residents."

Kressman concluded by saying "[t]here are no provisions in the narrative approach for rural districts or CSAs."

In other words, neither a rural district nor a CSA is a well-defined local community and cannot use the narrative approach to regain their broad fields of membership.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.