Monday, August 14, 2017

Overwhelming Majority of CUs that Received Section 208 Assistance No Longer Active

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) reported that an overwhelming number of credit unions that received Section 208 assistance exited the credit union industry, according to the agency's emergency merger proposal.

In recent years, Section 208 assistance has taken the form of capital notes, cash advances, and non-cash guarantees.

Between the first quarter of 2001 and the fourth quarter of 2016, 181 credit unions received at least one type of section 208 assistance. Out of these 181 credit unions, 165 credit unions stopped filing Call Reports.

NCUA further noted that a vast majority of the credit unions that received Section 208 assistance exited the credit union industry prior to or shortly after receiving this assistance.

Of these 165 credit unions, 152 credit unions, or 92.1 percent, stopped filing Call Reports prior to or within 15 months of receiving the section 208 assistance.

Specifically, NCUA found that:
  • 13.9 percent of the credit unions that received section 208 assistance began receiving such assistance after they filed their last Call Report. 
  • An additional 61 credit unions filed their final Call Report in the same quarter in which they first began receiving section 208 assistance. 
  • Another 68 credit unions filed their final Call Report within one year after the quarter they first received section 208 assistance
Based upon this evidence, NCUA believes that Section 208 assistance is a good indicator of a credit union being in danger of insolvency.

4 comments:

  1. That last sentence is a classic.
    Everyone should read it twice.
    A good indication of a cu failing would be determined by the supervisor WAY before "asssistance" is needed.
    This report is the text book definition of forbearance.
    And it's all Congress needs to know to justify the merging of this agency out of existence.
    Does melrose have 208?
    Does LOMTO?
    Did Riverdale?
    Congress, what are you waiting for?
    McW what are you doing over there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No problem. McW now combines TCCUSF and NCUSIF to keep these failures 'cost-free' for now, and he's a 'hero' for ending CCU loss fund before the 2021 deadline. All credit unions funded that, may soon get back 10 cents on the dollar, satisfied to get back anything from this sovereign regulator. All muddled in time for 2021's next cu contribution to NCUSIF to cover NGN shortfalls. Thank you sir may I have another.

      Congress wrote the playbook on taking and managing other peoples money, would give McW an atta-boy.

      Delete
    2. I always like "Animal House" references. I nominate Bluto, D-Day, and Otter to the NCUA Board. They couldn't do worse

      Delete
    3. "You (messed) up! You trusted us!"

      Delete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.