Wednesday, August 2, 2017

NCUA's $1 Billion Legal Contingency Fee In Crosshairs of Republican Lawmakers

POLITICO PRO is reporting that Republican lawmakers are probing more than $1 billion in contingency fees paid by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to two law firms.

NCUA has recouped more than $5 billion from investment banks over the sale of faulty mortgage-backed securities to five failed corporate credit unions.

"The payment of over one billion dollars in legal fees to private counsel raises serious questions about the propriety of the NCUA's legal fee arrangements, including whether the arrangements were in the best interest of the NCUA," Representative Ann Wagner (R-MO) said in a March 1 letter to the agency's chairman, Mark McWatters. Wagner chairs the House Financial Services subcommittee on oversight.

Wagner is seeking information from NCUA regarding the agreement with the two law firms, including all records related to the selection of the law firms and all communications between the agency and the two law firms.

The two law firms are Korein Tillery and Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel.

In comparison, the Federal Housing Finance Agency recovered more than $25 billion on behalf of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; but paid two different law firms, based on an hourly fee basis, more than $400 million.

The article notes NCUA met at least once with the law firms in an attempt to renegotiate the terms of the agreement.

Read the story (subscription required).

Update: Below is the Representative Wagner's letter to NCUA (click on image to enlarge). Unfortunately, the image quality of the letter is poor.






2 comments:

  1. Claw back on Fenner time.
    One of the lawyers he paid is a bff.
    Congress, DO YOUR JOB.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Once again an incompetent NCUA entered into a legal contract the benefits going to the law firms and not the credit unions they should be representing with fidelity. Follow the money. Someone at the NCUA got greased on these contract. This is not the exception to the rule at the NCUA. It is the rule. To Fenner: "You're fired!" Just who approved the damn contract? Fire them, too.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.