Tuesday, August 9, 2016

CU Uses Cross-Collateralization Clause to Get Paid Even from the Grave

Recently, a relative had an unpleasant experience with a large Tennessee credit union due to the credit union's use of cross-collateralization clauses.

Her father had died. At the time of his death, he had outstanding car and credit card loans with the credit union.

She paid off the car loan but the credit union refused to release the title until she paid off the outstanding debt on his credit card. The credit union had cross-collateralized the credit card loan with the car loan.

This costs her several thousand dollars more that she could hardly afford.

If it had been me, I would have given the credit union the keys to the car and walked away.

It seems to me that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau should examine this practice by credit unions to determine if it is abusive.







Posted by at
Labels: ,

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousAugust 9, 2016 at 10:53 AM

    My, aren't you the generous one. There is no information regarding the amount of equity in the car or the size of the estate. My guess is the daughter wanted the car but didn't want to take care of dear old dad's other debts and obligations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Keith LeggettAugust 9, 2016 at 12:58 PM

    I thought credit card debt was unsecured. But it appears not to be the case at many credit unions.

    This should be a warning signal to people -- don't have all your accounts with a single credit union.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousAugust 9, 2016 at 4:08 PM

    Keith,
    I think the practice is fairly typical at credit unions..as visa credit cards replaced the old personal unsecured lines of credit, the cross collateralization practice went with the visa credit card offer. We are into relationships, not one off products and services. All fully disclosed. If someone isn't willing to cross collateralize, we aren't willing to extend credit. That is also why we can offer 6.9%,8.9% and 10.9% rates instead of 18% plus.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousAugust 10, 2016 at 12:00 PM

    In this case, I agree with Dr. Leggett. Reg Z is specific about security on credit cards. The CUs I have worked for have cross-collateralization clauses but I have encouraged not to use on credit cards because of the Reg Z requirements on secured credit cards.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.