Friday, November 2, 2012

Range of Future Assessments Shrinks

NCUA is reporting that the upper end of projected assessments associated with the Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund (Stabilization Fund) declined between December 2011 and June 2012.

According to the agency's analysis, the estimated range of future Stabilization Fund assessments is now between $6 billion and $8.9 billion compared to a projected range between $6 billion and $9.3 billion six months earlier.

The agency cited several factors for the narrowing of the range of future assessment estimates, including changes in housing prices, interest rates, unemployment rates and mortgage prepayments.

In addition, NCUA noted a slight improvement in the performance of the legacy assets backing the NCUA Guaranteed Notes.

Read the press release.

3 comments:

  1. Have heard from or talked to many fellow credit unions.
    So far, no one believes NCUA.
    Wonder why?

    Credit Unions to Issa, keep digging.
    You'll find a mountain of "oversight" issues.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agreed, no one believes NCUA on this topic.

    No one has forgotten that NCUA is forcing credit unions whose boards chose to NOT invest capital in the corporate credit unions, pay for the ccu losses, anyway.

    These credit union boards, by not opting-in to ccu membership or serving on their boards, were sending an alert to the NCUA for years about corporates. NCUA's reply was to ignore their alerts, but send them all the bill.

    No one has forgotten.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Time for congress to do its job, for once.
    All Issa needs to do is dig into CCU mess, Commodre Perry, Norlarco, forbearance, texans, telesis
    Better yet. Just look into charter conversions. Especially first basin and tech cu.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.