Monday, November 5, 2012

Issues NCUA's Inspector General Needs to Examine in the Hiring of Law Firms

In a recent blog post, I reported that Representative Issa requested that NCUA's Inspector General review if NCUA must comply with an executive order signed by President George W. Bush in 2007, titled "Protecting American Taxpayers from Payment of Contingency Fees." The executive order prohibits federal agencies from entering into contingency arrangements with outside law firms.

NCUA last year hired two law firms under a contingency arrangement associated with lawsuits filed against investment banks over mortgage-backed securities sold to failed corporate credit unions.

As the Inspector General conducts its review, there are several issues it should explore beyond whether the agency is subject to the 2007 executive order and whether this was the best option for the agency.

First, the Inspector General needs to review whether the bids were subjected to competitive open bidding process. It is unclear from the Wall Street Journal story whether the bidding process was open. John Ianno, the NCUA's associate general counsel, told the Wall Street Journal that he was not aware if the agency interviewed any other law firms for this work.

Second, the Wall Street Journal story noted that then-general counsel Robert Fenner, who entered into the contracts with the two law firms, worked with Mr. Frederick of Kellogg Huber at the Justice Department. Kellogg Huber was one of the two law firms selected. Did Fenner's connection with Frederick influence the awarding of the bid?

The Inspector General should disclose what factors led to the selection of the two law firms, especially Kellogg Huber.
Posted by at
Labels: ,

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousNovember 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM

    Amen.
    NCUA to Issa- "drop dead, we're the NCUA. We report to no one. We are accountable to no one. We do what we want, including flaunting the will of congress on the MBL cap with our cute low income designation end run. Including making charter conversion much more difficult than congress intended. Including trying to muscle the cu times into not revealing the chair of the SRC. And now, the fenner connection."

    Credit unions to Issa- "do your job. Keep digging. There is a lot more. Just ask first basin"

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 9, 2012 at 10:19 PM

    The NCUA is not an agency. They are a joke.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.