Friday, September 28, 2012

NCUSIF Losses by CU Asset Size, 1998 - 2012

NCUA in its proposed rule regarding the definition of a small credit union published information on the history of failures among credit unions of various asset size categories that caused losses to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) from 1998 through year-to-date 2012.

Since 1998, there have 262 credit union failures that have resulted in $945.4 million in losses to the NCUSIF.

The following table shows the the number of failures, NCUSIF losses, and average size of loss by asset size group. This information does not include losses from the failure of five corporate credit unions.


Posted by at
Labels: ,

4 comments:

  1. AnonymousSeptember 29, 2012 at 9:50 AM

    The real story is that there are 399 camel 4/5 credit unions with 30 billion in assets and they're not being dealt with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousOctober 1, 2012 at 4:29 PM

    And Banks for the same period ....

    500 Banks with Losses exceeding $91.5 billion, or 100 times those of credit unions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keith LeggettOctober 1, 2012 at 4:58 PM

    You have a scaling problem. You need to adjust for asset size of the industries.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousOctober 3, 2012 at 7:17 AM

    Just did some quick math for the Cuna anonymous above. 30 billion in camel 4/5 assets in credit unions is about 33% of the equity of the movement.
    Ouch!
    Needs a white paper!
    Does congress know this?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.