The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.
The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.
It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.
Yeah what the heck is with the NCUA. So the FDIC gives it away for free. The NCUA makes you jump through some type of hoop and sets up a challenge that is near impossible to hit on the first attempt. So I type in gibberish 3 or 4 times. By the 5th time the NCUA must feel sorry for me and they let me in. The test to be on the NCUA board is easier than the image challenge. This explains why the NCUA has a poor image. They are not an agency. They are a joke.
ReplyDeleteC,mon Keith. That would be transparent. They're in lock down and have been since the bonds started failing at wescorp. That began a 5 year effort to make everything more confusing so that they could then go on a listening tour.
ReplyDeleteYour challenges are just as annoying only we aren't trying to see PUBLIC information!!!!
I have the same problem. Very annoying. I am guessing, but I think this is a response to vendors and other 3rd parties using robots to get call report data sooner than NCUA makes it available in their quarterly files. I'm sure that slows down a system. If they would redesign their system it would be easier on both ends. And If they would include a last update date on each cu call report header it would stop repetitive requests from vendors. They don't usually want data that hasn't changed. CUs should ask for a refund on all of the wasted money to make the website look better when the problem is a poor infrastructure underneath.
ReplyDeleteOne NCUA fix at a time. First, a new Executive Director.
ReplyDelete