Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Material Loss Review of Vensure FCU

NCUA's Office of the Inspector General (IG) recently released its Material Loss Review of the failure of Vensure Federal Credit Union. The estimated loss from the failure of Vensure to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund is $39 thousand; but it could go higher if the Department of Justice seeks to recover Vensure’s earnings related to processing illegal internet gambling ACH transactions.

The IG report found that NCUA's decision to seize Vensure arose from a Department of Justice action against several on-line poker companies. As a result, the Department of Justice seized all funds of one of Vensure’s members - Trinity Global Commerce Corp. (Trinity), a processor of on-line gambling transactions. Trinity was Vensure’s largest depositor at the time and nearly all of Vensure's earnings (nearly 90 percent during 2010) came from transaction fees processing Trinity’s internet gambling transactions.

After Trinity’s funds were seized, Vensure had an Automated Clearing House (ACH) receivable of approximately $877,000 as a result of subsequent return items. When Vensure recognized the loss from the uncollectible ACH receivable, the credit union became insolvent.

In addition, the IG report concluded that Vensure’s management and Board did not operate the credit union in a manner consistent with typical natural person credit unions. Vensure had minimal loans in 2009 and no loans during 2010 and 2011.

The report states that "the significant and rapid increase in Vensure’s fee related income, as well as the size of the individual and cumulative ACH wire transactions given the small size of the credit union, the significant change in the make-up of its management and Board, and its few traditional sources of income, should have triggered ... examiners to expand the scope of their on-site examinations and supervision contacts to thoroughly evaluate the credit union’s income to determine the nature of its source and why it increased so rapidly." But there is no evidence that examiners did a detail review regarding the nature and scope of the business fee income nor questioned the Board and management over the change in Vensure's business model.

Read the report.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.