Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Groups Call for Changes to QM Framework Ahead of GSE Patch Expiration

A broad coalition of financial industry stakeholders, civil rights groups and other advocacy organizations wrote the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) on September 9 offering feedback on the expiration of the temporary “GSE patch,” which grants Qualified Mortgage (QM) status to loans eligible to be purchased or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

The letter was sent in response to an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking by the CFPB.

With the CFPB poised to allow the GSE patch to expire as scheduled in January 2021, “or after a short extension,” the groups proposed several changes to the QM framework. The groups called on the CFPB to eliminate from the general QM category the debt-to-income ratio and the associated Appendix Q. They noted that doing so is “the best way to enable fair market competition across all lending channels while also ensuring that these creditworthy individuals can be served in a safe and sound manner under the existing ATR-QM framework.”

The groups also called on the bureau to maintain and enhance the existing Ability-to-Repay Rule’s regulatory language and maintain the existing QM statutory safe product restrictions that prohibit certain risky loan features—such as loan terms over 30 years, negative amortization or interest-only payments—and clarify provisions related to documentation and verification of income.

Both the American Bankers Association and the Credit Union National Association signed the letter.

Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.