Thursday, July 25, 2019

Troubling Proposal from NCUA

The National Credit Union Administration is proposing that an FCU will be required to develop and maintain a written plan if its public unit and nonmember shares, taken together with borrowings, exceed 70 percent of paid-in and unimpaired capital and surplus.

This proposal ignores that the reliance on volatile and expensive nonmember deposits and borrowed funds could expose the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) to a loss.

For example, Beehive Credit Union, which failed, held up to 18 percent of its deposits in high-cost nonmember deposits. The Material Loss Review of this failure noted that these high-cost nonmember deposits partially contributed to the $27.6 million loss to the NCUSIF.

According to the Material Loss Review of Chetco Federal Credit Union. the credit union's management failed to develop an adequate liquidity plan to address rapid loan growth. The report noted that management funded its rapid loan growth through a combination of borrowed funds and deposit products with above-market rate. But as Chetco's financial condition deteriorated, a corporate credit union reduced its line of credit, subjecting the credit union to liquidity risk. The failure of Chetco resulted in an estimated loss to the NCUSIF of $76.5 million.

The NCUA Board should require all FCUs to develop and maintain written plans when an FCU is relying on high-cost, volatile nonmember shares and borrowings to fund its operations above a de minimis threshold.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.