Monday, April 8, 2019

Impact of Risk-Based Loan Pricing on CU Credit Availability and Risk

Credit unions are increasingly employing risk-based loan pricing models.

A 2018 paper in the Journal of Empirical Finance, Risk-based Loan Pricing Consequences for Credit Unions, examines whether risk-based pricing increases the availability of loans, particularly for high-risk borrowers.

The study uses credit union data obtained from fourth quarter call reports published by the National Credit Union Administration over the period from 2006 through 2015.

The paper found that credit unions that adopt risk-based loan pricing strategies:
  • are larger,
  • have lower net worth ratios,
  • are more dependent on fee income, and
  • have higher loan interest rates.
Also, credit unions with a more traditional deposit mix, which is dominated by regular shares, are less likely to adopt risk-based loan pricing strategies.

Data on the number of loans per credit union member and loan delinquency rates are used to analyze loan access and average risk-levels, respectively.

The authors, Walke, Fullerton, and Tokle, contend that the number of loans issued is a better measure of loan availability than the dollar value of loans.

The study found that risk-based pricing adopters increase the availability of loans relative to otherwise similar non-adopters.

However, delinquency rates were somewhat lower for adopters of risk-based pricing compared to matched non-adopters. This finding appears to be at odds with a priori expectations.

The authors conclude that the lower delinquency rate at risk-based pricing adopters suggests that the increased availability of loans went to lower risk borrowers.

The authors posit that risk-based pricing results in charging higher interest rates to riskier borrowers, which might suppress loan demand by this group of borrowers, and charging lower interest rates to less risky borrowers, which would increase the demand for loans by this group.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.