Monday, December 10, 2018

Mazuma CU Settles Overdraft Lawsuit

Mazuma Credit Union (Overland Park, KS) has agreed to pay $1.36 million to settle class action lawsuit over its overdraft practices.

The lawsuit (Bowens v. Mazuma Credit Union) alleges the credit union charged an overdraft fee on transactions although the member had sufficient funds in the current account to complete the transaction. The credit union used the available balance method to levy an overdraft fee.

The lawsuit claims breach of contract and violations of Regulation E.

The class settlement includes anyone charged an overdraft fee by the credit union between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2015.

Mazuma Credit Union charged approximately $3.4 million in overdraft fees when there was enough money in the account to cover the transaction. Analysis found 12,031 members of Muzama were in the class.

The settlement agreement will also require the credit union to assess overdraft fees using the current balance in a member's account rather than on the available balance. This operational change would have reduced overdraft fees at Muzuma over the four year period by almost $3 million.

Read more.

1 comment:

  1. I was included in this and received a check for $272.44 but Mazuma still has a charge against me for $766.00 on my credit report which is all due to their overdraft fees.They never use to be bad about overdraft fees, I was a member for twenty years plus and all of a sudden they started taking money out of my account. I left them because of this.I was getting paid around $700. a week, automatic deposit and my whole paycheck would be totally gone. I left them soon after that happened.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.