Tuesday, November 6, 2018

Is NCUA AWOL in Examining CUs for SCRA Compliance?

Is the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) absent without leave (AWOL) with regard to ensuring credit unions are complying with the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA)?

On November 2, Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union (Poughkeepsie, NY) settled allegations that it violated the SCRA by repossessing vehicles owned by SCRA-protected service members without first obtaining the required court orders.

But what I found of interest in the press release was that prior to August 2014 Hudson Valley FCU did not have any written policies and procedures that address SCRA's protections against non-judicial auto repossessions.

You would have expected that one of the largest credit unions in the country would have had in place policies and procedures prior to August 2014 to ensure that the credit union was complying with the law.

Also, it is notable that NCUA was not part of this settlement. According to the press release, the Department of Justice launched its investigation after learning about two private SCRA lawsuits filed against the credit union.

This begs the question as to why there was not a referral from NCUA to the Department of Justice regarding these SCRA violations.

The evidence suggests that NCUA has not historically examine federal credit unions for compliance with SCRA. A July 2012 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that between 2007 and 2011 NCUA only examined 0.02 percent of federal credit unions for SCRA compliance.

But a NCUA official told GAO that the agency would start to review credit union lending practices to ensure compliance with SCRA.

It is possible NCUA examined Hudson Valley FCU and recommended remedial actions to address the credit union's SCRA issues.

To determine if NCUA has followed through on its pledge to GAO, the NCUA Inspector General should launch an audit reviewing NCUA's examination of credit unions for SCRA compliance.







No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.