Monday, May 21, 2018

Federal Preemption Extended to FISCUs over Use of Term Bank

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) recently expanded the federal preemption to federally-insured state chartered credit unions (FISCUs).

In a May 11 legal opinion letter, NCUA stated that the Federal Credit Union Act (FCUA) and the agency’s advertising regulation preempted two Wisconsin Statutes, which barred state chartered credit unions from using the terms “bank” or “banking” in any form (with limited exceptions).

NCUA wrote that Wisconsin Law conflicted with NCUA's advertising rule.

NCUA contended that "[p]rohibiting federally insured credit unions from using these terms inhibits their ability to compete and, thus, jeopardizes their safety and soundness."

NCUA further stated that this preemption would level the playing field between state chartered credit unions and federal credit unions, which are not burdened by such state laws.

Moreover, NCUA stated that it does not believe the use of the word bank or its derivative as a verb is a deceptive trade practice, despite the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions thinking otherwise.

The legal opinion letter, however, stated that a credit union cannot call itself a bank or banking organization.

This legal opinion will allow credit unions in other states to push back on state laws that restrict the use of the term bank or banking in their advertising.

I wonder how the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors and the states will react to this encroachment by NCUA onto their turf.

Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.