Tuesday, April 24, 2018

NCUA to Sen. Hatch: CUs Would Need a Taxpayer Bailout, If Taxed

In a March 28 letter to Senator Hatch (R - UT), National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Chairman McWatters wrote that that eliminating the credit union tax exemption without addressing the remaining regulatory differences between banks and credit unions “would almost certainly have a detrimental effect on the credit union system and increase losses to the Share Insurance Fund, which could ultimately fall to U.S. taxpayers.”

The letter was in response to Senator Hatch's January 31 letter expressing concerns that credit unions may be operating beyond their tax-exempt purpose.

According to McWatters' letter, NCUA's analysis found that "without eliminating the field of membership restrictions, member business lending restrictions, investment capital restrictions, investment authority restrictions, and other restrictions", the elimination of the tax exemption would almost certainly create safety and soundness issues.

McWatters also mentioned that if credit unions were taxed, they "would need an appropriate transition period to incorporate any such changes into their business model" and credit unions should have the option of "something akin to an S corporation election."

However, the letter does not include any details from the agency's analysis.

In response to questions regarding what data the agency has on rejected associational common bonds and community charters, NCUA wrote that it has denied or deferred less than 10 percent of applications for new associational common bonds since its updated associational common bond rule became effective in 2015. The agency stated that it has approved nearly 80 percent of its applications with another 10 percent of applications pending.

“Instead of outright denial, the NCUA typically defers action on requests the agency cannot approve and, to the extent reasonably possible, offers alternative solutions consistent with the FCUA and the agency’s regulatory framework,” McWatters noted.

In response to a question from Hatch about the proposed community charter expansions that NCUA rejects, McWatters said that “NCUA’s tracking system does not distinguish between denials based on the geographic area requested as opposed to other reasons, such as safety and soundness,” thus limiting the agency’s ability to discern where credit unions are pushing field of membership boundaries.

With regard to the disclosure of executive compensation, NCUA noted in 2010 it required corporate credit unions to disclose executive compensation. In 2011, NCUA finalized a regulation eliminating most golden-parachute arrangements for troubled credit unions.

Unfortunately, NCUA has not acted on a staff recommendation to require all federal credit unions to disclose executive compensation.

Read NCUA's letter to Senator Hatch.

1 comment:

  1. NCUA, CUNA and nafcu to hatch....if credit unions get taxed, WE won’t exist anymore...and we will say and do anything to protect our trove of independence and lack of accountability. Anything.
    Large credit unions if taxed, will be fine as long as they get the same powers as banks.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.