Thursday, March 15, 2018

Bill Excludes Non-Owner Occupied Home Loans from Member Business Loan Cap

The Senate passed on March 14 S. 2155, Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act. A section of the bill would exempt one-to-four family non-owner occupied home loans at credit unions from the aggregate member business loan (MBL) cap of 12.25 percent of assets.

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), there is an estimated $18 billion of such loans on the balance sheets of credit unions.

CBO believes that credit unions holding approximately 20 percent of these non-owner occupied home loans would benefit from this section of the bill, "because they are approaching the cap on the amount of member business loans."

If S. 2155 becomes law, CBO estimates that these credit unions "would issue about 10 percent more loans for non-owner occupied homes each year."

The growth in non-owner occupied home loans at these credit unions would come at the expense of taxable financial institutions -- primarily commercial banks and thrifts.

CBO expects this provision to increase the federal deficit by $10 million over the 2018 - 2027 time period.

However, the CBO analysis does not look at the impact of this section on the ability of credit unions to originate more business loans, as these credit unions will have more breathing room relative to the MBL cap. Presumably the expansion in business lending would come at the expense of taxpaying financial institutions. This would suggest that CBO's estimate of this section of the bill understates the federal deficit.

Read CBO's analysis (go to page 9).

2 comments:

  1. Last time I checked this bill is supported by ABA, ICBA, CUNA, and NAFCU

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.