Thursday, February 22, 2018

State Bankers Associations: Time to Revisit CU Tax Exemption

State bankers associations wrote Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R - UT) on February 20th that taxpayers should no longer subsidize the nation’s largest credit unions, which effectively operate the same as taxpaying banks.

The letter came after Senator Hatch wrote the National Credit Union Administration last month raising concerns about whether credit union activities align with the purposes of the federal income tax exemption they enjoy.

While the credit union tax exemption was originally created to help institutions meet the credit needs of people of modest means with a common bond, the industry today has stretched the “common bond” requirements to allow credit unions to serve large, multistate regions, the associations said. They also pointed out that the number of credit unions with more than $1 billion in assets has more than doubled in the past decade, and that this group of almost 300 credit unions represents just 5 percent of the industry but enjoys 75 percent of the tax subsidy.

Noting that Congress missed a critical opportunity to address the treatment of credit unions in the new tax reform law, they urged Hatch -- the top tax policymaker in the Senate -- to revisit the tax exemption this year.

The letter stated that the tax code should not be used to pick winners and losers among similarly situated businesses. “There is no reason why the largest credit unions, which act and look just like the taxpaying banks they compete with, should be completely free of income taxation,” the associations wrote. “This creates a market distortion where the tax code effectively subsidizes one financial services entity (the largest credit unions) over another (the smaller community bank).”

Read the letter.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.