Monday, December 4, 2017

Is the Credit Union Tax Exemption the Third Rail of Politics?

An article in today's Wall Street Journal discusses why the credit union tax exemption is untouchable.

The article points out how credit unions have been successful in their grassroot efforts in keeping their preferential tax treatment off the chopping block, while lawmakers were scrambling to find tax breaks to eliminate to fund the tax code overhaul.

For example, the article mentions Project Zip Code, which matches credit union members addresses to Congressional Districts. This allows credit unions to tell Congressional offices how many credit union members would be affected by repealing the tax exemption in their Congressional districts.

The article stated that members of Congress would face "significant political blowback", if they proposed eliminating the credit union tax exemption.

However, I believe that the story overstates the clout of the credit union lobby. While the article mentions the 1998 legislation that overturned the Supreme Court field of membership decision, it failed to mention that the same 1998 legislation capped business lending at credit unions. It also did not point out that credit unions have been unsuccessful in their efforts to raise their business lending limit for more than a decade.

Read the story (subscription required).

3 comments:

  1. What a joke.
    These lawmakers make me sick and they don’t “make law”.
    People across all spectrums of the economy are paying taxes. We have a huge deficit. They’re willing to discuss eliminating the mortgage tax deduction, SALT, Medicare but $1B asset credit union “banks” don’t pay income tax?
    Is it because congress and the senate have a credit union so the pigs are really saving themselves? While they have a better medical plan than most Americans?
    These politicians are disgusting.
    My wife and I both work and for 4.5 months of the year or more we work to pay the government because it’s over a third of our income.
    What’s the risk?
    Just tax them. People won’t care.
    They’ll still have great rates from banks and credit unions.
    It’ll blow over in 5 minutes.
    Gutless.
    And unfair.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1998 also elevated cu capital/asset ratio requirements under PCA and with no flex for lower risk assets, further limiting asset growth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Credit unions want to buy banks, make business loans, market to anyone anywhere, raise secondary capital, make risk based loans, make indirect loans to a ton of non members and grow the over $1B in assets...sponsor stadiums and events ....all subsidized by NOT paying taxes while we have a deficit and everyone else pays taxes.
    And congress wants to cut Medicare and short change the military.
    Totally unfair, inequitable. They pick winners as if that’s what we’ve sent them there to do.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.