Sunday, September 3, 2017

Federal Court Overturns Obama Administration Overtime Rule

A federal judge in Texas on August 31 overturned the Obama administration’s final rule doubling the salary level used to determine whether employees are classified as exempt from overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The rule -- which would more than double the salary level for exemptions from $23,660 to $47,476, regardless of whether the employee would qualify for exemption under the test of “executive, administrative or professional” duties -- has been prevented from taking effect for nearly nine months pending litigation.

District Judge Amos Mazzant has now granted summary judgment for the plaintiffs in a lawsuit brought by 21 states and several business groups, invalidating the final overtime rule. It remains to be seen whether the Department of Labor will appeal the ruling; under the Trump administration, Labor Secretary Alex Acosta was expected to revisit the overtime rule and is currently seeking public comments on its projected impact.

Judge Mazzant ruled that in doubling the salary test, the Obama administration’s interpretation of the FLSA was not “reasonable” and therefore not warranting the “deference” otherwise shown by courts to regulatory actions under the Chevron precedent. “The Department has exceeded its authority and gone too far with the Final Rule,” he ruled. “Nothing in [FLSA] Section 213(a)(1) allows the Department to make salary rather than an employee’s duties determinative of whether a ‘bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity’ employee should be exempt from overtime pay.”

Read the order.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.