Thursday, November 10, 2016

Population Limit for Rural District Increases to 1 Million People

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Board on October 27th quadrupled the population limit for a Rural District.

The final rule increased the population limit for a so-called “Rural District” to 1 million people from 250,000. At the same time, NCUA dropped the alternate population limit of 3 percent of the population of the state in which the majority of the Rural District's residents would be located.

But as I pointed out previously, the final rule will allow an FCU to arbitrarily cobble together densely populated urban areas with sparsely populated counties. In fact, NCUA’s Rural District definition could define a region as rural, despite having more than half of the population living in urban areas.

Also, while NCUA states that a state does not meet the requirement of being a well-defined local community, the Rural District population expansion provides a backdoor for an FCU to have a state-wide field of membership.

Potentially, the states of Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming in their entirety could be designated as rural districts.

However, more than half of the residents in the states of Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming live in urban areas.

If this occurs, this would represent an abuse of the agency’s discretion.

Read the final rule.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.