Monday, July 11, 2016

GAO: Tax Expenditures Deserve Greater Oversight

In a recent report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted that tax expenditures deserve greater scrutiny and the federal budgeting process provides an opportunity to increase oversight.

Tax expenditures — special credits, deductions, and other tax provisions that reduce taxpayers’ tax liabilities — represent a substantial federal commitment. The credit union tax exemption is a tax expenditure.

U.S. Treasury estimates that $1.23 trillion in federal revenue was forgone from the 169 tax expenditures reported for fiscal year 2015. However, most federal agencies surveyed in the report could not identify how the tax expenditure furthered the mission of the agency.

The report points out that only proposed tax expenditures or those that expire are subject to review within congressional budget processes. Existing, non-expiring tax expenditures are not subject to such review. The credit union tax exemption is a non-expiring tax expenditure.

GAO identified various options to integrate tax expenditures into both the executive and congressional budgeting processes.

For example, GAO wrote that policymakers could require that all, or some subset of, tax expenditures expire after a finite period. This option would result in Congress periodically considering whether to allow tax expenditures to expire or to extend them, similar to the subset of tax expenditures that currently expire unless extended .

According to the report, if these options are implemented, they could increase transparency on how the federal government allocates resources, help policymakers identify how well tax expenditures are working, and create additional controls over spending through the tax code.

Read the report.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.