Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Senator Coburn Calls for Ending Wasteful Tax Breaks, Including Credit Union Tax Exemption

Senator Coburn (R - OK) released a report today identifying over $900 billion in wasteful tax breaks to Washington special interests.

Among the wasteful tax breaks spotlighted in the report is the credit union industry's exemption from the federal corporate income tax.

Senator Coburn notes that "the numerous preferences in the personal and corporate tax code come at a price" ... of keeping "the standard tax rates artificially high."

According to Senator Coburn, the credit union tax exemption "will cost taxpayers $2.1 billion in FY 2014 and $11.9 billion from FY 2014 through FY 2018."

The report notes that the credit union tax exemption "distorts competition within similar institutions and has no economic justification to exist."

The report states that the tax exemption has enabled credit unions to grow at more rapidly than other depository institutions with credit union industry assets nearly doubling between 2003 and 2012.

Also, the report points out that the common bond requirement, which at one time allowed credit unions to point to their uniqueness, has been all but eviscerated and that anecdotal evidence indicates that credit unions are not fulfilling their purpose of serving people of modest means.

Go to page 116 of the report to read why Senator Coburn recommends eliminating the credit union tax exemption as a part of comprehensive tax reform.

6 comments:

  1. Don't need to go to page 116.
    The exemption is no longer justified. I'd rather have acces to capital and more business lending authority.
    There is no reasonable or supportable justification of this loophole.
    Those of us with assets greater than $500 million or $1B should be taxed and regulated by a real regulator.
    Bring it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm curious, if that's truly how you feel, why not convert to a bank? What's keeping you from pursuing this option?

      Delete
    2. NCUA regulations combined with obstruction by industry insiders make the decision to convert fraught with extraordinary, unnecessary risk and cost. Despite congress intention that it not be so.

      Delete
  2. With the end of the tax exemption let's also require credit unions to be examined by the OCC

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's amazing how these politicians are so brave with their opinions when they're retiring. Where were these bon mots when they were in office? Coburn is another cowardly politician who steals taxpayer money and does nothing for the welfare of his constituents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats a good point.
      Alot like Fryzel who is suddenly chatty cathy fryzel.
      Guess that's another former cu regulator looking for cu business.

      Delete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.