Monday, November 3, 2014

NCUA Lacks BSA Transparency

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Office of the Inspector General recently released a report looking at FDIC's respose to Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) concerns at FDIC examined banks.

The report looked at a four-year period between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2013.

The audit repoted on the number of BSA examinations and visitations conducted by FDIC and state banking agencies. The report also provided summary statisitics for each fiscal year on:
  • the number of banks cited for apparent BSA violations,
  • the number of apparent violations,
  • the number of formal and informal enforcement actions imposed on FDIC-supervised banks,
  • and the number of referrals to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen) for the issuance of Civil Money Penalties (CMP).

The report found that during the four-year period
"the FDIC and/or applicable state regulator cited FDIC-supervised institutions for 3,294 apparent violations of BSA-related regulations, agreed to or issued 175 BSA-related informal and formal enforcement actions, and made 22 referrals to FinCEN for CMPs."

However, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) with the exception of a few published enforcement orders does not disclose any information regarding BSA and AML concerns at NCUA examined credit unions.

As a matter of transparency, NCUA should publish summary statistics regarding BSA and AML concerns at credit unions. For example, FDIC in its annual report publishes the number of BSA examinations and the number of consent orders and memoranda of understanding that are based in whole or in part on apparent BSA violations.

In addition, NCUA's Office of the Inspector General needs to conduct an audit of the agency with regard to BSA supervision. This issue has not been the focus of an an Inspector General audit over the last 15 years.

It seems that such an audit is well overdue.

Read the FDIC Audit Report.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.