Tuesday, October 28, 2014

CUNA Spending Big This Election Cycle

Forget about the image of credit unions being the little guy, credit unions have become a big-time special interest group in Washington, D.C.

According to a story in The Hill, the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) and its political action committee, the Credit Union Legislative Action Council, have spent $5.6 million during the 2014 election cycle.

The article notes that "[s]o far, $3 million has been spent on direct PAC contributions, $1.2 million on independent expenditures and $1.4 million on partisan communications.

More than 80 separate pieces of direct mail, resulting in more than 2.1 million individual mailings, have been sent to more than 417,000 credit union members" in several tight races."

Beyond direct mailings, the article also points out that CUNA is running television, radio and online advertisements for candidates.

Clearly, if tax-exempt credit unions can spend almost $6 million to influence election outcomes, then credit unions can afford to pay corporate income taxes.

Read the article.

2 comments:

  1. If bankers and their trade associations were not spending millions of dollars to get pro-banker/anti-credit union people into elective office, then it would not be necessary. FYI - Federal credit unions cannot make contributions to political candidates like national banks. It is people making those donations - just like bankers to banker-supported groups.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just look at the shape our economy, safety, global respect, waste of money, neglect of the U.S. constitution, health care, boarder control, privacy, EPA, Dodd Frank Laws, CFPB bullying, Durbin Amendment, mismanagement of the NCUSIF, and much more that this Democrat led administration has done to us. If CUNA uses PAC money to contribute to this party they must be drinking Kool-Aid or being politically correct afraid of retaliation. Take a stand. No money for a group of people who are destroying our country. Credit Union leaders are so afraid of taxation but cannot see the real danger right square in their face and it is not taxation. Face reality and think for yourself and not let other groups such as CUNA, NAFCU, Leagues and Politicians think for you.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.