Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Matz: CU System Would Not Have Survived without $26 Billion in Federal Government Assistance

In a July 23 speech to the Annual Convention of the National Association of Federla Credit Unions, NCUA Chairman Debbie Matz defended the agency's risk-based capital proposal by pointing out the credit unions received significant assistance from the federal government and would not have survived without it.

Matz said:

"While the worst of the crisis now appears to be receding into the rearview mirror, we cannot forget its lessons. First and foremost, we cannot forget that the federal government had to pump $26 billion into the credit union system to prevent it from collapsing. Without an infusion of $20 billion from NCUA’s Central Liquidity Facility and an additional $6 billion from NCUA’s line of credit at the U.S. Treasury, the credit union system as we know it would probably not have survived.

Even with this extraordinary assistance from the federal government, 102 credit unions still failed. Many of those credit unions appeared to have sufficient capital. That is, until they collapsed. Those failures cost the Share Insurance Fund three-quarters of a billion dollars. Through strong supervision, we were able to prevent an additional $1.5 billion dollars in losses from troubled credit unions that were on the brink of failing."

Read Matz's speech.

6 comments:

  1. Credit union people - why do you say that it wasn't a gov't bail out? Did you even know it was that big?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, we knew it was that big because we had to pay for it. NCUA coordinated with the US Treasury Dept. during the meltdown and borrowed $6 billion from the government (fully paid back with interest) and our system provided all the additional needed liquidity. Liquidity which was needed because of the meltdown created by big banks, mortgage companies and others who specialized in selling over priced homes to people who couldn't afford them and then securitized the paper and sold that crap around the world. The credit union system was and is safe and secure, especially if we can avoid the traps created by the 'to big to fail' banks and their Wall Street buddies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice try at deflection talking about banks, but back to the point. You're telling us that when the NCUA's chair said the federal government pumped $26 billion into the credit union system, you think she's lying? And that it was only $6 billion borrowed and the rest came out of credit union's pockets?? You really should learn how to do at least a little of your own research - it's not that difficult and clearly you're listening to the wrong people. It didn't take me 10 minutes to find some of the loans. I found $10 billion that the CLF borrowed from the treasury in 2010, and I see the $2.6 billion in outstanding loans to NCUA, as of last month. Try the Federal Financing Bank's website in the press releases section - and notice FDIC never borrowed any money. In your defense - I do have to say - the post office's loans make credit unions look good.

      Delete
    2. Right, it's a bigger bail out on a % of asset basis.
      Cuna= liar.
      My board chair reminded me that Hample said it would only be 10 bps and credit unions ought to pay it and move on. Just the write down of mcs at the corporates was than 10 bps. He's CEO now!

      Delete
  3. Paid it all back?
    Still owe us treasury and the unrealized loss is (still) $6billion.
    This story hasn't entered it's final chapter.
    Then there's texans and keys and a lot of camel 4/5 credit union assets.
    Anybody want to buy some church loans??

    ReplyDelete
  4. Foreclose on the Church and GOD is getting mad. Not sure the credit union's are doing the Good Lords' Work. Tell Jesus to get off the cross...we need the wood.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.