Thursday, April 24, 2014

Number of Problem CUs Edges Lower by One to 306

The National Credit Union Administration reported that the number of problem credit unions was largely unchanged during the first quarter of 2014.

The number of problem credit unions fell by one during the quarter to 306 credit unions at the end of the first quarter and is down by 33 credit unions from one year ago.


A problem credit union has a CAMEL rating of 4 or 5.

Problem credit unions held $11.9 billion in deposits (shares), which equals 1.37 percent of the industry’s insured shares.


Assets at problem credit unions at the end of the first quarter were $13.6 billion, which is 1.3 percent of the industry's assets.

The following slide shows the number of problem credit unions and deposits by asset size.


Six credit unions failed during the first quarter of 2014 -- three involuntary mergers and three assisted mergers.
Posted by at
Labels: ,

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousApril 24, 2014 at 6:52 PM

    what are the problem assets of banks as a % of the bank industry?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 25, 2014 at 8:03 AM

      Yes. How do the 2 industries compare?

      Delete
  2. Keith LeggettApril 25, 2014 at 8:08 AM

    At the end of 2013, the percent of banking industry assets in problem banks is 1.04 percent.

    FDIC will release the number of problem banks and assets at problem banks for the first quarter of 2014, when it releases its Quarterly Banking Profile (QBP). The QBP comes out usually 55 days after the end of the quarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousApril 25, 2014 at 12:17 PM

      But take out the four trillion dollar banks to see what the real number is. BofA, Wells, Citi and Chase do not count since they are truly too big to fail - evidenced in 2008 and 09 for City.

      Delete
  3. AnonymousApril 26, 2014 at 8:33 AM

    Problem assets in credit unions equal to the insurance fund???
    6 years AFTER the credit bubble??
    And my CEO just told me the bad bonds in CCUs is still $22 BILLION??
    So we have potential for losses equal $35 BILLION.
    Is anybody stress testing this?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.