Thursday, November 21, 2013

No TCCUSF Assessments for 2014

NCUA is reporting that there will be no Temporary Corporate Credit Union Stabilization Fund (TCCUSF) assessments for 2014.

NCUA staff has set the range of post-2013 TCCUSF assessments between minus $200 million and $1.6 billion.

In addition, NCUA announced that the range of NCUSIF assessments for 2014 will be between 0 and 5 basis points.

Posted by at
Labels: , ,

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousNovember 21, 2013 at 3:43 PM

    Why even 5bps? They plan to increase in their 2014 spending by 6.7%, and decrease their operating charge to federally chartered credit unions, then take our deposit insurance fund deposit money to pay for all of it via a higher transfer rate out to themselves. And then we ALL pay a 5bp assessment to replace the insurance money NCUA took.
    As a state chartered cu chairman, seems we are 0 for 2 here.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 21, 2013 at 5:57 PM

    Suggested Press Release for ABA:
    "Attention credit union members: Do you know that all of the money called capital at your credit union is legally owned by you? Do you know that your credit union Board works for you but has been letting employees of the federal government take your capital money, as much as they need, to use for pay raises for themselves? Send this to your board and ask that they comment. They must, because you are an owner.
    The buck does stop with you."

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousNovember 22, 2013 at 6:58 AM

    The board materials show that NCUA still owes the Treasury $4.7 billion. So how can their range of future assessments be negative $200 million to $1.6 billion? Are they depending on winning the other lawsuits to make up the difference? Or some other source of revenue? Or are they just stringing us along and the assessments will start again later?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousNovember 22, 2013 at 11:38 AM

      I'm a CPA (as well as a CU CEO) that can read a balance sheet and can understand finance. But for the life of me, I don't understand NCUA's "accounting" for the stabilization fund. Either NCUA is incompetent, they're lying to us about how much is actually owed, or both.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousNovember 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM

    Seems like Cuna finally accomplished something!
    Pressured NCUA into no assessments for corporates and downsized gentilly!
    Pretty good.
    The NCUA market value on legacy assets is a minus $6billion and Treasury is still owed $4.7 billion.
    Good year to convert to private insurance or to a savings bank like HarborOne did...save money and get out before the balloon payment!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.