Friday, July 12, 2013

Credit Unions Raise OD Fees, Bank OD Fees Unchanged

The Washington Post reported on a study released by Moebs Services that showed "credit unions have been raising overdraft fees on ATM withdrawals, checks and debit card purchases at a faster pace than banks to offset a decline in consumers overdrawing their accounts."

According to the article, the median overdraft charge at banks was $30 a transaction for the past four years. However, the median overdraft fee at credit unions has risen from $25 to $28 per transaction in the past two years.

But the article does not adjust for the difference in tax treatment between credit unions and banks, as credit unions are exempt from federal corporate income taxation. If you adjust for the difference in tax treatment, the credit union median tax adjusted overdraft fee is closer to $40 per transaction -- $10 higher than the median overdraft fee charged by banks.

To derive the median tax adjusted overdraft fee divide the current median overdraft fee by (1 minus the tax rate). For this analysis, the tax rate was assumed to equal 30 percent.

This would suggest that the tax exemption is not being passed through to the credit union member.

5 comments:

  1. That analysis would assume the entire overdraft fee is pre-tax profit. This seems exagerated as it does not include costs associated with systems, compliance, repayment and fraud risk, human resources, and general overhead

    ReplyDelete
  2. And Dr. Leggett's computed tax adjusted rate would also apply to Subchapter S banks which do not pay federal corporate taxes. And to banks that receive tax credits in areas that created CRA benefits/compliance for the bank.

    At the end of the day, this is a bogus number.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is a very weak argument tying credit union tax exemption to the charge for a single item in isolation of all other related charges and costs. What about daily maximums, daily overdrawn balance fees and monthly service charges? The tax exemption fight is much better focused on business lending and asset growth, not an isolated fee.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The tax exemption is not passed on to consumers and has outlived it's usefulness in 85% of the assets of credit unions....it's still true to cause in 15% of assets ... The 6000 with assets less than 500 million who are still in mission.
    Our board is willing to pay taxes if we can get regulatory parity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Of course there are costs associated, but don't let that keep you from seeing the real point. We are distracting ourselves pretending that we are completely in the right when in fact, we need to do better. Too many of us spend too much on too high operating expenses and not enough on lowering fees and improving rates to our members.

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.