Monday, May 13, 2013

Does the Tax Subsidy Get Passed Through to Members?

A 2005 study by the Tax Foundation concluded that very little of the benefits from the credit union tax exemption was passed through to the members in the form of lower loan rates or higher savings rates. Most of the tax benefit was retained by credit unions, which went either towards increasing the size of credit unions or to higher labor costs.

The study found:

"Of the 50 basis points in subsidy that the tax exemption provides, at least 33 basis points accrue to owners in the form of larger equity and larger assets. Approximately 6 basis points may accrue to credit union borrowers through lower interest rates, and not more than 11 basis points are absorbed by higher labor costs. There is little or no effect on deposit rates or other costs."

6 comments:

  1. Haven't seen this before.
    Is there a link?

    ReplyDelete
  2. http://taxfoundation.org/article/competitive-advantage-study-federal-tax-exemption-credit-unions

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this is a great article. It seems any other non-profit (though credit unions are supposed to be not-for-profit)have some level of accountability to the IRS by being required to complete a 990. On top of not sharing their tax exemption benefits with their members, they aren't even accountable to anyone for how they spend it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Doesn't this mean that banks have nothing to worry about? The argument is that credit union's tax advantage allows them to price better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What about the study "Banks and Credit Unions: Keeping the Playing Field Level" by Consumer Action that stated banks have between a 20 and 75 basis point tax advantage over credit unions? Even when the credit unions small tax advantages are considered?

    Let us compare the federal corporate tax exemption of Subchapter S banks vs. that same exemption of credit unions.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Your premise seems to be supported by what the con-artists at Arizona Federal CU are doing. They are serving far fewer members from far fewer locations yet the huge growth in fee income and salaries are lining the pockets of employees, especially management. When you compare the fee income and salary growth to declines in membership numbers and total assets, it becomes apparent who is benefitting, or attempting to benefit from the money grab. If members woke up to what is happening, they would want to stop the looting of the credit union from the stewards who should be protecting the members.

    http://arizonafederalcreditunionmembers.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/arizona-federal-you-dont-shrink-your-way-to-greatness-click-on-folder-icon-in-lower-right-to-expand-file/

    ReplyDelete

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.