Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Why So Long?
According to the Material Loss Review (MLR) on Telesis Community Credit Union, the credit union was first identified as a problem institution in September 2007. At that time, its CAMEL composite rating was downgraded to "4". A credit union with a CAMEL 4 rating is designated as a problem institution.
In December 2006, Telesis Community Credit Union had a CAMEL composite rating of "2".
According to a colleague who was a former bank regulator, you usually don't see a two notch downgrade. So, the CAMEL "2" rating was probably a dirty two or alternatively there was a material decline in the credit union's performance.
However, it was not until June 2010 that Telesis Community was subject to a Letter of Understanding and Agreement.
This period of more than 2 1/2 years between first receiving a CAMEL 4 rating and the formal enforcement action seems like a long time.
So, why did it take so long to issue a Letter of Understanding and Agreement to Telesis Community Credit Union?
That is the question that credit union officials, policymakers and the media should be asking credit union regulators.
In December 2006, Telesis Community Credit Union had a CAMEL composite rating of "2".
According to a colleague who was a former bank regulator, you usually don't see a two notch downgrade. So, the CAMEL "2" rating was probably a dirty two or alternatively there was a material decline in the credit union's performance.
However, it was not until June 2010 that Telesis Community was subject to a Letter of Understanding and Agreement.
This period of more than 2 1/2 years between first receiving a CAMEL 4 rating and the formal enforcement action seems like a long time.
So, why did it take so long to issue a Letter of Understanding and Agreement to Telesis Community Credit Union?
That is the question that credit union officials, policymakers and the media should be asking credit union regulators.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment