Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Convicted Swindler Sues CU for Failure to Perform Biz Loan Due Diligence

Convicted swindler Michael Vorce has filed a federal lawsuit against Lake Michigan Credit Union alleging that the lack of oversight by the credit union allowed him to obtain millions in business loans for non-existent boats.

According to Vorce, Lake Michigan Credit Union extended loans based on fake serial numbers that were never verified, resulting in loans for millions of dollars for boats that did not exist. By March 2007, Vorce had obtained fraudulent loans worth $4.7 million.

Vorce claims he filed the lawsuit on the behalf on the members of Lake Michigan Credit Union.

You can't make this up.

Read the story.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.