Friday, June 3, 2011

Appeals Court: FCUs Subject to NY Mortgage Recording Tax

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York upheld a lower court decision that Hudson Valley FCU and all other federal credit unions operating in New York are subject to the state's mortgage recording tax.

Hudson Valley sought a declaration that it and other federal credit unions are exempt from the New York State mortgage recording tax (MRT), in connection with mortgages made by them to their members, under the Federal Credit Union Act of 1934 (FCUA) and the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution.

Contrary to Hudson Valley's contention, the Court found that the mortgage recording tax is a tax on the privilege of recording a mortgage, not a tax on property.

Additionally, the Court "rejected plaintiff’s contention that the FCUA should be interpreted so as to exempt federal credit unions’ mortgage loans, and the right to record them, from the MRT because the imposition of the tax undermines the statute’s main policy of making low-cost credit available to average Americans." The Court noted that at the time the FCUA was enacted, federal credit unions did not have the authority to make home loans. The Court further notes that Congress had amended the FCUA authorizing federal credit unions to make residential mortgage loans, Congress never amended the statute specifically to exempt federal credit unions’ mortgage loans from the mortgage recording tax. Therefore, the Court concluded that it does not have to consider whether federal credit unions have an implied exemption from the MRT under the Supremacy Clause.

To read the decision, click here and go to page 37.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.