Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Media Stereotypes Lead to Lack of Objectivity

The national media appears to have bought into a stereotype that credit unions are the best deal for consumers.

Here are some examples of the lack of objectivity from these consumer reporters. Farnoosh Torabi for moneyeatch.com wrote “I’ve always been a huge advocate of credit unions.” Tim Chen, a reporter for The Christian Science Monitor, wrote “given their reputation for great customer service and consumer-friendly policies, I highly recommend you ditch your national bank for a credit union.”

But stereotypes are standardized and simplified conceptions, which are based on some prior assumptions, and as a result may cause a person to make a poor financial decision.

If people only believe that they can only get favorable treatment or deals from credit unions, then they will miss opportunities offered by other financial institutions.

In fact, there are taxpaying banks that are offering better deals to consumers than credit unions.

For example, a friend recently bought a pre-owned car. When this friend went to finance the purchase, the best rate was from a bank, not credit unions – even with their tax advantage.

So while NCUA Board Member Michael Fryzel in a recent speech stated that credit unions leave money in the consumers’ pockets, NCUA also stated that credit unions with higher net worth ratios have paid for the higher net worth ratios with reduced services and less favorable rates [Federal Register (Volume 75, Number 248) December 28, 2010, p. 81384].

Moreover, it seems in the case of my friend, it was the bank that left more money in his wallet, not a credit union.

What this points out is that it pays to shop around. Just because a financial institution has the word “credit union” on its door does not mean that it is the best deal for consumers.

It is time that the national media removes their credit union blinders and stop being a credit union pom pom squad.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.