Tuesday, January 11, 2011

NCUA's Inconsistency on Disclosures

Sometimes I can only shake my head in disbelief over the actions of the NCUA.

On December 9, NCUA in testimony advocated for an increase in the business lending authority for credit unions, which means a possible reduction in consumer loans. Then on December 17, NCUA put in place mandatory disclosure rules regarding credit union conversions to a mutual savings bank or bank-credit union mergers requiring a clear and conspicuous disclosure of how the merger or conversion will affect the members’ ability to obtain non-housing-related consumer loans. This disclosure should specify possible reductions in some kinds of loans to members.

While NCUA is concerned that converting to a mutual savings bank or merging into a bank will mean less consumer loans, NCUA appears unconcerned that lifting the business loan cap will reduce the amount of consumer loans going to members.

Excuse me, but doesn't increasing the ability of credit unions to make more business loans relative to their assets mean that credit union members' ability to obtain non-housing-related consumer loans will be affected.

If NCUA really believes that it is important that members know that a conversion to a mutual savings bank or merger into a bank could possible cause a reduction in some kinds of loans, shouldn't NCUA require such a disclosure of credit unions if they plan to increase the percentage of their loan portfolio going to business loans?

Moreover, shouldn't the credit union receive the consent of the members before the credit union embarks on a business lending expansion?

After all, NCUA has openly stated that business lending is riskier than consumer lending. So, allowing credit unions to increase their concentration in business lending could materially impact the interest of credit union members.

Unfortunately, we have not heard a peep out of NCUA about such disclosures regarding an increase in business lending.

I suspect the real motive behind NCUA's disclosure requirement for credit union conversions to a mutual savings bank charter or a credit union merger into a bank is to prejudice the vote in these transactions.
Posted by at
Labels: , ,

1 comment:

  1. Arp D. TrivediJanuary 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM

    Well said, Keith, and duh. We, of the credit union cloth, are a little...uh...smothering of our own kind. It's the way we roll.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
 

The content is provided for educational purposes only, with the understanding that neither the authors, contributors, nor the publishers of this site are engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other expert or professional services. If legal or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Comments appearing in response to articles appearing on this site do not necessarily reflect the views of the ABA. ABA makes no representations regarding the truth or accuracy of commentary or opinions that may be posted in response to the articles that appear on this website.

The inclusion herein of any link to a website, either in the text of an article or in a comment, does not denote any approval, sponsorship, or endorsement by the ABA, and ABA is not responsible for the content or opinions expressed on those linked websites or related commentary. This content is not licensed to third parties sites and is not affiliated with any third party site. Any reference to the author or this content on any third party site on the Internet is not authorized by the ABA.

It is the policy of the American Bankers Association to comply fully with all antitrust laws. Certain discussions should be considered off-limits, including those that contain competitively sensitive data such as price and cost information, or statements that could be construed as reflecting an attempt or desire to control or influence a particular market or markets. Future pricing or other prospective competitive information should never be shared.